Allowed

Rathnamma v. State

Karnataka HC17 Jun 2022CRL.P/3571/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge Bench allowed criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., quashing Special Judge's order rejecting vehicle release application. Relying on Division Bench reference, Court held Special Judges have jurisdiction under Sections 451/457 Cr.P.C. for interim custody of vehicles in NDPS cases, remitting matter for merits.

What did the court decide?

Quashed Special Judge's order rejecting application; remitted matter to Special Judge to consider application under Section 457 Cr.P.C. on merits.

Rathnamma Vs State — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Karnataka HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION No.3571/2021

¶7

BETWEEN

¶8

RATHNAMMA, W/O KEMPAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O HATTINAGARA, VIDYANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201.

¶9

... PETITIONER

¶10

[BY SRI.GOPAL K.B., ADVOCATE]

¶11

AND

¶12

STATE REPRESENTED BY PSI, CHANNAGIRI POLICE STATION, DAVANAGERE - 577 213. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶13

... RESPONDENT

¶14

[BY SMT.K.P.YASHODA, HCGP]

¶15

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPL.JUDGE (NDPS) AT DAVANAGERE IN SPL.CASE (NDPS) NO.7/2020 DATED 09.03.2021 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE (STATE REP BY PSI, CHANNAGIRI P.S) TO RELEASE THE VEHICLE REGISTRATION

¶16

¶17

BEARING NO.KA-51-P-1822 IN PF.NO.141/2020, DATED 10.09.2020 AND ALLOW THIS PETITION.

¶18

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order dated 09.03.2021 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS), Davanagere in Special Case (NDPS) No.7/2020, wherein the petitioner is alleged of offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) and 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act').

¶21

What drives the petitioner to this Court is rejection of an application filed under Section 457 of Cr.P.C., seeking release of the vehicle involved in the alleged crime.

¶22

The learned Special judge by his order dated 09.03.2021 holds that the Court has no power to release the vehicle and therefore, turns down the application.

¶23

¶24

An identical issue had been referred and placed before the Division Bench of this Court in Crl.P.No.3571/2021 and connected matters, disposed of on 17.05.2022, wherein the Division Bench has held as follows:

¶25

" Thereby, the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai's case stated supra will apply to the vehicles seized under the NDPS Act as well. Any contrary view taken by the Courts of law would be against the interest of the owner of the vehicles, the public at large and the State.

¶26

48. By virtue of Section 36-C of the NDPS Act, "Save as otherwise provided in this Act", the provisions of the Cr.P.C. have been made applicable to the Special Court constituted under the provisions of the NDPS Act by Armendment Act No.2 of 1989 with Simu effect from 29.5.1989. "Save as otherwise provided in the Act", employed in Section 36-C of the NDPS Act, is indicative of/reflection of the word "exception" intended to exclude some provisions of the Cr.P.C like Section 360 Cr.P.C. etc., which have been expressively excluded by the NDPS Act by Sections 32A and 33 of the NDPS Act. As such, the above

¶27

¶28

stated phrase has qualified the operation of the Cr.P.C. in the proceedings before the Special Court to the extent provided in the NDPS Act. Once the Code of Criminal Procedure has been made applicable, the provisions of the Cr.P.C. contained in Sections 451 and 457 of the Cr.P.C. would automatically be attracted. As such, with effect from 29.5.1989, the Cr.P.C. as a whole, subject to the exception craved out as noticed herein-above, has been made applicable to the proceeding before the Special Court (NDPS) and therefore, application under Sections 451 and 457 of the Cr.P.C. for interim custody of the vehicle seized_in commission of offence punishable under the NDPS Act would be maintainable and the Special Judge (NDPS) is empowered to consider the application under Section 451/457 of the Cr.P.C. on merit.

¶29

58. In the judgments relied upon by the learned Counsel for the respondents in the case of Shajahan -vsInspector of Excise and Others reported in 2019 SCC OnLine Kerala 3685 (DB) (paragraph-3) and Union of India -vs- Mohanlal and Another reported in (2016)3 SCC 379 , there was no occasion to consider the application for release of the interim custody of the vehicle (conveyance) and in that

¶30

¶31

view of the matter, the said judgment relied upon by the learned Counsel for the respondents to the effect that Drug Disposal Committee has power and not the Magistrate or the Special Court under the NDPS Act, have no application to the facts and circumstances of the present petitions.

¶32

XI Conclusion

¶33

59. For the reasons stated above, we answer the Reference as under:

¶34

i) The Magistrate or the Special Court is conferred with the power/jurisdiction to consider the application for interim consider of the conveyance/vehicle under the provisions of Sections 451 and 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in cases arising out of the provisions of NDPS Act; and

¶35

ii) The Drug Disposal Committee constituted under the Notification dated 16.1.2015 issued by the Central Government under the provisions of Section 52A of the NDPS Act has no authority to consider the application for release of interim custody of the conveyance/vehicle;

¶36

¶37

60. Place the matters before the learned Single Judge having roster to dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law in the light of the decision on the reference made by this Court stated supra with prior approval from the Hon'ble Chief Justice."

¶38

Therefore, in the light of the afore-extracted order, the Special Judge has power to consider an application for release of material under Section 451 or 457 of Cr.P.C in cases arising out of the provisions of the NDPS Act.

¶39

In the light of the judgment of the Division Bench supra , the Special Judge will have to consider the matter on its merit.

¶40

For the aforesaid reasons, the following:

¶41

ORDER

¶42

i. Criminal Petition is allowed.

¶43

ii. The impugned order dated 09.03.2021 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Special Judge (NDPS), Davanagere stands quashed.

¶44

¶45

iii. The matter is remitted back to the hands of the learned Special Judge to consider the application filed under Section 457 of Cr.P.C. on its merit, in accordance with law.

¶46

Ordered accordingly.

¶47

Sd/JUDGE

¶48

Rathnamma v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rathnamma v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt C R Ashwini Vs Sri Ganesh P

syed ishrathulla hussaini Vs Mr. Noor Ahmed N.M

Sri Avinash H v Vs State of Karnataka

Naufal Vs Union of India

Thippeswamy Vs the State of Karnataka

I Rizwan Pasha Vs the State Represented by