Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an award by the Bangalore Lok Adalath. The Court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition.
None. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION No.7650 OF 2020 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN
SMT. C.R. ASHWINI W/O SRI V. RAGHAVENDRA, AGED 36 YEARS, R/AT NO.230, CHANDU ENCLAVE, FF-202, 1ST FLOOR, NAIDU LAYOUT, CHIKKALSANDRA, BANGALORE-560061
... PETITIONER
[BY SRI.RAGHU PRASAD B.S., ADV.]
AND
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NEW NO.41 (OLD NO.27) 2ND FLOOR, 1ST "C" MAIN ROAD, MOOKAMBIKANAGAR, HOSAKEREHALLIK, BSK 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560085
... RESPONDENTS
[BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR D., ADV.]
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH IMPUGNED AWARD PASSED ON 9.3.2019 IN C.C.20833/2018 BY THE CONCILIATOR JUDICIAL MEMBER OF THE LOK ADALATH, BANGALORE AND PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-G TO THE WRIT PETITION
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks
leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The submission is placed on record.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
KG
SMT. C.R. ASHWINI
SRI GANESH P
SMT MAMATHA S
M. NAGAPRASANNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
