Madankumar v. the State by
Case brief
What is this about?
In this criminal petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for bail in a POCSO case, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G. UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2884/2022
Between:
Madankumar S/o Thippeswamy, Age: 27 years, R/o Kittur Village, Davanagere Taluk, Davanagere
… Petitioner
(By Sri. Shetty Deepak, Advocate)
And:
The State by Rural Police Station authorities Davanagere Represented by State Public Prosecutor, High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru-560001.
… Respondent
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant permission to withdraw the bail petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Madankumar S/o Thippeswamy
- respondent
The State
Coram
M.G. Uma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/2884/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court