The criminal appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution after the appellant failed to comply with a conditional order granting time to address an office objection filed in the underlying trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1262 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
D. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE DASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.140, NARASIPURA, MAIN ROAD, VIDYARANYAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 097.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. KUMARA L., ADVOCATE)
AND
SHAIK SILAIMAN S/O SAIK KHASIM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.243, 9TH MAIN, NARASIPURA MAIN ROAD, VIDYARANYAPURA, BANGALORE - 560 097.
...RESPONDENT
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL FILED U/S 378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 04.11.2020 PASSED BY THE XVIII ACMM, BANGLAORE IN C.C. NO.24469/2016 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
J U D G M E N T
No representation for the appellant and respondent.
Vide order dated 10.10.2022, a week's time has been granted to comply with the office objection, failing which the necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of appeal.
Inspite of conditional order, steps have not been taken.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
LL
D. KRISHNAPPA
SHAIK SILAIMAN
J.M.KHAZI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
