Criminal Appeal No.1627 of 2019 filed by Mr. M.Doddappa against an acquittal order. The appeal was dismissed for default due to lack of representation and failure to comply with procedural requirements under Section 378(4) CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1627 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SRI. M.DODDAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE BHEEMAPPA, R/AT NO.24, 25, 26, 10TH MAIN, 1ST CROSS, NAGARBHAVI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 072 … COMPLAINANT/APPELLANT
(BY SRI. AMBAJI RAO PAWAR, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
SMT. VARALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D/O VENKATAPPA NO.B-203, DOS HOUSING COLONY, R.P.C. LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 040
...ACCUSED/RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF ACQUITTAL IN C.C.NO.14984/2014 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE XXIII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, AT BANGALORE DATED 06.01.2016 BY CONVICTING AND PUNISHING THE RESPONDENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
J U D G M E N T
No representation for the appellant.
representation for the appellant.
chance, this appeal is posted today for taking necessary
steps, with a condition that if needful is not done, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of appeal.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for default of not complying with the office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
MDS
SRI. M.DODDAPPA
SMT. VARALAKSHMI
J.M.KHAZI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
