The appellant filed a criminal appeal challenging bail status. During arguments, the counsel for appellants requested permission to withdraw the appeal. The court, on admission, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1574/2022
BETWEEN:
BANGALORE – 560 049 …APPELLANTS
(BY SRI VEERANNA G TIGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
:: 2 ::
BANGALORE – 560 016 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP FOR R1; SRI.B.S.PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER, ENLARGE THEM ON BAIL IN SPL.C.C.NO.5/2022 (CR.NO.257/2021) OF AVALAHALLI POLICE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.341,302,143,120-B,147,148,149 OF IPC AND SEC.3(1)(R)(S) OF SC/ST (POA) AMENDMENT ACT 2014 WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE AT BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
After arguing for sometime Sri. V.G.Tigadi, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Therefore appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
:: 3 ::
Subject to co-operation by the accused the
trial court may expedite the trial.
Sd/JUDGE
sd
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SHIVAPRASAD @ SHIVU @ TINKU S/O SRINIVAS
ABHISHEK @ ABHI S/O KUMAR K
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
SMT V ROOPA
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
