This order dismisses a criminal appeal filed under section 449(ii) CrPC on the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal without reaching the merits of the case.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.491/2020
BETWEEN:
ABDUL HANEEF S/O ISUBU AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO.1-141/A PADARU MADAK HOUSE VITTLA PADNUR VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK D.K. DISTRICT – 574 222 …APPELLANT (BY SRI.B.LETHIF, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY VITTLA POLICE STATION D.K. DISTRICT REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 449(ii) OF THE CR.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22.04.2019 IN CRL.MISC.NO.1071/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K., MANGALURU AGAINST THE APPELLANT.
:: 2 ::
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Appellant’s counsel has filed a memo seeking
permission to withdraw the appeal. Memo is placed on record. Appeal is dismissed as
withdraw.
Sd/JUDGE
sd
ABDUL HANEEF S/O ISUBU
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
