The Karnataka High Court observed that the petitioners filed a memo withdrawing the writ petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
WRIT PETITION NO.997 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN
BOTH ARE PARTNERS OF M/S. ELITE, BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS, MEZZANINE FLOOR, MYSORE TRADE CENTRE, OPPOSITE SUBURBAN BUS STAND, B.N. ROAD, MYSURU – 570 001.
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI RAJESWARA P.N., ADVOCATE)
AND
2
MADAGALLI VILLAGE, YELAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU – 570 026.
... RESPONDENTS
(CAUSE TITLE AMENDED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 24.02.2021)
(BY SRI M.N. KUMAR, CGSC FOR R-1; SRI S. RAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND UDNER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION 148 OF THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 AS INSERTED BY SECTION 3 OF THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2018 NO.20 OF 2018 ANNEXURE-H IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND BEING VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLES 14, 19 (1) (d) AND 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawing the petition.
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
GBB
Narayana Gowda
M. Pradeep Kumar
Union of India
N. Lakshmana Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court