Allowed

N Santhosh Kumar v. Smt Rajeshwari

Karnataka HC3 Aug 2021CRL.P/999/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka allowed the withdrawal of Cr.P.No.999/2021 and Cr.P.No.2169/2021 filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings against petitioners for offences under Sections 420, 504, 506 and 34 IPC. The petitions were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions after the charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw petitions; petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions after filing of charge sheet.

N Santhosh Kumar Vs Smt Rajeshwari — Cheque Dishonour | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION No.999/2021

¶6

C/W

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION No.2169/2021

¶8

In Crl.P.No.999/2021

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

N. SANTHOSH KUMAR SON OF M.NAGENDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1288/2 SANTHOSH BUILDING HONDA CIRCLE DAVANGERE-577 001.

¶11

..PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI S.V.LAKSHMINARAYAN., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

SMT. RAJESHWARI

¶15

WIFE OF MARUTHI

¶16

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 318/21

¶17

“A” BLOCK ,

¶18

¶19

DEVARAJARAS EXTENSION DAVANAGERE – 577 001.

¶20

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY DAVANAGERE EXTENSION POLICE STATION DAVANAGERE – 577 001. REP. BY SPP. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE – 560 001.

¶21

..RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI B.J.ROHITH, HCGP FOR R-2; R-1 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

¶23

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.143/2020 IN THE COURT OF THE 1^ST JMFC JUDGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT IN SO FAR AS THIS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 420, 504, 506 AND 34 OF IPC.

¶24

In Crl.P.No.2169/2021

¶25

BETWEEN:

¶26

C.S.SAMPREET SON OF LATE SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶27

C.S.SAMARTH SON OF LATE SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS

¶28

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 2912/1 5^TH MAIN, 3^RD CROSS

¶29

¶30

MCC B BLOCK DAVANAGERE – 577 001.

¶31

...PETITIONERS

¶32

(BY SRI NITHYANANDAN.P.C., ADVOCATE)

¶33

AND:

¶34

SMT. RAJESHWARI WIFE OF MARUTHI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.318/21 “A” BLOCK DAVARAJARAS EXTENSION DAVANAGERE-577 001.

¶35

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY DAVANAGERE EXTENSION POLICE STATION DAVANAGERE – 577 001. REP. BY SPP. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE – 560 001.

¶36

..RESPONDENTS

¶37

(BY SRI B.J.ROHITH, HCGP FOR R-2;)

¶38

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING THAT TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.143/2020 IN THE COURT OF THE 1^ST JMFC JUDGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT IN SO FAR AS THESE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 420, 504, 506 AND 34 OF IPC.

¶39

¶40

THESE CRIMINAL PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶41

O R D E R

¶42

Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these petitions.

¶43

The submission is placed on record.

¶44

Permission granted. These petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions after filing of the charge sheet.

¶45

Sd/JUDGE

¶46

AKC/VN

N Santhosh Kumar v. Smt Rajeshwari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N Santhosh Kumar v. Smt Rajeshwari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. M Inder Kumar Vs the State of Karnataka

Dr Arun Kumar Vs the Police Inspector

Mr Praveen Kumar B B Vs Mrs Nivitha

Narayana Gowda Vs Union of India

C S Sampreet Vs Smt Rajeshwari

Rajashekaraiah Vs State by Women Police