Petitioners withdrawn a writ petition challenging an impugned civil order, claiming it became infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous with liberty to urge grounds before the Appellate Court.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with liberty to urge grounds before the Appellate Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 36778 OF 2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF UPPER HUTHA
BHADRAVATHI …PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI. B.S.PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND :
SRI BASAVARAJ S/O M.M. ARASAYYA AGED 53 YEARS R/O BEHIND N.T.B. A.K. COLONY STREET BHADRAVATHI …RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUNGED ORDER DATED 12.07.2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED III ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C AT BHADRAVATHI IN O.S.NO.72/14 ON I.A.NO.9 IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-E AND ALLOW THE I.A. NO.8 AND ETC.,
2
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri B.S.Prasad, learned advocate for the petitioners submits that this writ petition is rendered infructuous and seeks leave to withdraw the same with liberty to urge all the grounds before the Appellate Court. He undertakes to send a memo to this effect through E-mail. Once received, Registry to keep the same in record.
2. In the circumstance, this writ petition is dismissed as
having become infructuous with liberty as prayed for.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
AV
SMT. UMA W/O VIJAYKUMAR
KUMARI. MONISHA D/O VIJAYKUMAR
SRI BASAVARAJ S/O M.M. ARASAYYA
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
