Arun Kumar Agrawal v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Single bench hearing listed writ petition challenging an order of the Central Information Commission under the RTI Act. The court granted time to comply; otherwise the petition faces rejection. No substantive decision issued.
What did the court decide?
Two weeks time granted to do the needful; failing which petition stands rejected on its own.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.7817/2015 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN
ARUN KUMAR AGRAWAL AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE DR R S P AGRAWAL T8 EAGLETON GOLF RESORT 30 KM BANGALORE MYSORE HIGHWAY BIDADI, RAMNAGARAM TALUK BANGALORE 562 109
…PETITIONER/S
(BY SRI./SMT.: A.K. AGRAWAL PARTY-IN-PERSON)
AND
- 1 . SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER SEBI BHAVAN BANDRAKURLA COMPLEX BANDRA (EAST) MUMBAI-4 00 051.
- 2 . RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR MAKER CHAMBERS IV
W.P.NO.7817/2015
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the petitioner's writ petition seeking quashing of CIC order and direction to R-2 under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ARUN KUMAR AGRAWAL
- respondent
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER
- respondent
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR
- respondent
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR
- respondent
RITINRAI, ADVOCATE REPRESENTING 12 COMPANIEES
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/7817/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court