Petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 claiming a bank loan was tainted by fraud. During preliminary hearing, parties contended the petition had become infructuous. The court disposed of the petition without merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.49528 OF 2013(GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
… PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. X M JOSEPH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VINOD KUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE BANK LOAN AS PERPETUATED BY FRAUD BE GIVEN
2
PRECEDENCE AND BINDING ON THE R1, DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
It is submitted at the Bar that prayer sought in the writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same be
disposed off as having been infructuous.
Accordingly, petition stands disposed off as having
been infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Bsv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shanthi Charitable Trust(Registered), by its Managing Trustee Shri. Basavaraj V V
Basavaraj V V
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Bengaluru
State Bank of India, Head Office, Mumbai
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
