Smt. Padmini v. the Deputy Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Court adjourned the petition for two weeks to comply with office objections, contingent on depositing Rs.2,000/- to the Advocates' Welfare Fund. Failure to comply would result in rejection.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.7649/2021 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN
SMT. PADMINI W/O. LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO. 91/3, 2ND CROSS, 1ST MAIN, VADDARAPALYA, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BENGALURU-560 086.
…PETITIONER/S
(BY SRI./SMT.: NAGARAJA S , ADVOCATE)
AND
- 1 . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU.
- 2 . THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU.
- 3 . SMT. B. K. SAVITHRI W/O. NAGARAJ, D/O. LATE KEMPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO. 121, 6TH MAIN ROAD,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SMT. PADMINI W/O. LATE KEMPAIAH
- respondent
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
- respondent
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION
- respondent
SMT. B. K. SAVITHRI
- respondent
SMT. B. K. SUCHITHRA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/7649/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court