Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the impugned order in M.C. No. 58/2015. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to failure of the petitioner to take steps despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.54848 OF 2017 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SRI. L. KESHAVAMURTHY, S/O G.R.LAKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.84, 12TH CROSS, NEAR POLICE STATION, RAJAGOPALANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 058.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. D.L.SOMESH, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
SMT. PROMODINI, WIFE OF KESHAVAMURTHY, DAUGHTER OF KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT BYRANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDABELE POST, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 25.11.2017 PASSED ON IA NO.III IN M.C.NO.58/2015 PASSED BY THE III ADDL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU VIDE ANNX-E BY ALLOW THE ABOVE W.P.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
ORDER
Umpteen number of times opportunity was given for
taking steps after notice was ordered on 29.05.2018; despite that, nothing has happened in the matter from the side of petitioner. Therefore, petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
DS/JY
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. L. Keshavamurthy
Smt. Promodini
Krishna S.Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
