Dismissed
Murali Sm v. Karnataka State Bar Council
Karnataka HCWP/6571/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO.6571 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN :
MURALI S.M. S/O MANJUNMATH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS DHANOJI PALYA KASABA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK PIN – 562 123
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RANGANATH REDDY R., ADVOCATE)
AND :
KARNATAKA STATE BAR COUNCIL OLD K.G.I.D. BUILDING HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU KARNATAKA – 560 001
... RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. G. NATARAJ, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE KARNATAKA STATE BAR COUNCIL TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO ENROLL AS AN ADVOCATE.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking to withdraw the petition. The memo is taken on record.
For the reasons stated in the memo, the petition is
dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NM
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Murali S.M. (S/o Manjunnmath)
Karnataka State Bar Council
Praadeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court