Writ petition challenging public tender contract dismissed as infructuous since the contractual term (2015-2018) had expired, rendering the petition non-survivable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3rd DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
WRIT PETITION NO.33000 OF 2016 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
MANMATHSHETTY S/O.MAHABALA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.3/201 NADIGUNDYA HOUSE KULAVOR VILLAGE KUPPE PADAVU POST MANGALORE TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT – 474 144
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
NATIONAL INSTITUTION OF TECHNOLOGY KARNATAKA, SURATHKAL SRINIVASANAGAR POST MANGALORE D.K.DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY PROFESSOR IN CHARGE N.I.T.K.S HOSTELS – 474 144
... RESPONDENT (BY SRI UDYA FOR SRI T.N.RAGHUPATHY, ADVOCATES FOR R-1, SRI RAJESHWARA P.N., ADVOCATE FOR R-2,R-3,R-4 & R-7, SRI HEMACHANDRA R.RAI, ADVOCATE FOR R-4 & R-5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 16.05.2016 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
2
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Mr Dhananjaya Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the tender contract which is questioned before this Court pertains to 2015-2018. The term of contract was for a period of two years. In view of the fact that terms of contract has come to an end nothing would survive in this petition.
learned counsel for impleading applicants also concur with the same.
SD/JUDGE
VK
Manmathshetty S/o.Mahabala Shetty
National Institute of Technology Karnataka
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
