Dr. H P Shantha Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Case brief
What is this about?
The Karnataka High Court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner was absent and did not make any representations during three consecutive hearing dates.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner was absent and did not make any representations during three consecutive hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.6267/2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
WRIT PETITION No.6267/2018 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN :
DR.H.P.SHANTHA KUMAR S/O. PUTTASWAMY GOWDA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT NO.22, R.K.LAYOUT 3RD STAGE, 6TH CROSS PADMANABHA NAGAR BENGALURU- 560 070 …PETITIONER
(BY SRI V.ANANDA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND :
(BY SRI P.PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP FOR R1; SRI A.CHANDRA CHUD, ADVOCATE FOR R2 [ABSENT])
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 20.01.2018 (ANNEXURE-D) PASSED BY XLVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES AT BANGALORE CITY (CCH-47) IN SPL.C.C.NO.122/2017.
W.P.No.6267/2018
2
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
None appears for the petitioner.
dates there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Therefore the petition is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
KSR
Dr. H.P. Shantha Kumar
Central Bureau of Investigation
The Regional Passport Officer
K.S. Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court