Petitioner challenged an order recalling a non-bailable warrant. Finding the warrant was recalled by the trial court on 14.07.2021, the court treated the petition as infructuous and disposed of it.
The criminal petition was disposed of as it became infructuous after the trial court recalled the non-bailable warrant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.P.No.2667/2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2667/2017
BETWEEN :
SRI H.E.RAGHAVENDRA ADVOCATE SON OF LATE ERAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT DR.AMBEDKAR NEW LAYOUT HOLENARASIPURA TOWN HASSAN DISTRICT … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.G.VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE)
AND :
SRI NAGARAJU SON OF SANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT BELAVADI VILLAGE DODDAMAGGE HOBLI ARAKALAGUDU TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT … RESPONDENT
(BY SRI MURTHY D.L., ADV.)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 10.03.2017 IN C.C.NO.612/2014 PENDING BEFORE THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., ARAKALGUD, HASSAN.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.P.No.2667/2017
2
O R D E R
This petition is filed challenging the order of the
Trial Court rejecting the application of the petitioner/accused to recall the non-bailable warrant issued against him.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KG
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition to quash the non-bailable warrant should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri H.E. Raghavendra Advocate
Sri Nagaraju
K.S. Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
