Petitioner challenged order dismissing amendment plea in civil suit. Court dismissed writ petition as infructuous because underlying suit was already disposed of.
Writ petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.5880 OF 2020 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
CHANNAKRISHNAPPA S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A LAKKAHALLI KASABA HOBLI SIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT PIN-562 102 …PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. N. NAVEEN KUMARA, ADVOCATE)
AND :
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRs
2
RESPONDENTS NO.1(A) TO 1(D) RESIDING AT LAKKAHALLI VILLAGE KESAVA POST, KASABA HOBLI SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK PIN-562 102 …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OR SET ASIDE THE ORDER 28.11.2019 IN O.S. NO.305/2009 BY THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC AT CHIKKABALLAPUR, ON IA FILED SEEKING FOR AMENDMENT OF PLAINT UNDER ORDER VI RULE 17 OF CPC, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri N.Naveen Kumara, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the suit has been disposed of. Hence, this petition is rendered infructuous. His submission is placed on record. He undertakes to send a memo to this effect. Once received, Registry shall keep the same in record.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
AV
CHANNAKRISHNAPPA S/O MUNIYAPPA
CHIKKAHANUMAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRs
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
