H a Kumar v. Ramadas Raikar
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition seeking quashing of an arrest warrant was dismissed as infructuous based on the petitioner's submission that the impugned order is no longer operative.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.4045 OF 2020 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
H.A. KUMAR S/O A. HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS EMPLOYEE IN ESI HOSPITAL NITTUVALLI ROAD DAVANAGERE …PETITIONER (BY SHRI. N.RAMAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR SHRI M.R. HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE)
AND :
RAMADAS RAIKAR S/O HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS ADVOCATE RESIDENT OF NO.2605, 2ND CROSS, M.C.C. 'A' BLOCK DAVANAGERE-577 004 ...RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF ARREST WARRANT PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT DAVANAGERE IN EX.CASE NO.167 OF 2019 DATED 27.01.2020 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
H.A. KUMAR
- respondent
RAMADAS RAIKAR
Coram
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/4045/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court