Dismissed

Rajanna H D v. the State of Karnataka Represented by

Karnataka HC5 Jul 2021WP/56461/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitioners sought directions to authorities to consider representations regarding the initiation of proceedings against a person not arrayed as a respondent. The High Court dismissed the petition on the short ground that the third party is not a respondent.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider representations regarding proceedings against Sri Mariyanna.

Rajanna H D Vs the State of Karnataka Represented… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶2

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF JULY 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.56461/2017 (KLR RES)

¶6

BETWEEN :

¶7

RAJANNA H D S/O. LATE DODDAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS AGRICULTURIST RESIDING AT HINDISAGERE C S PURA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572216

¶8

RENUKARAJU H P S/O. LATE PARASHURAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS AGRICULTURIST RESIDING AT HINDISAGERE C S PURA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572216

¶9

... PETITIONERS

¶10

(BY SRI. MADHU C.S, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND :

¶12

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS

¶13

REVENUE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

M S BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560001

¶15

¶16

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU DISTRICT TUMAKURU

¶17

THE TAHASILDAR GUBBI TALUK GUBBI - 572216

¶18

THE REVENUE INSPECTOR C S PURA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572216

¶19

... RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI. A.R.SRINIVAS, AGA)

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS SUBMITTED TO THE R-1 DATED 17.08.2017, 30.08.2017 AND 26.09.2017 SHOWN AS ANNX-A, ANNX-B AND ANNX-C RESPECTIVELY, REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED TO THE R-2 DTD 08.08.2017 SHOWN AS ANNX-D, REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED TO THE R-3 DTD 08.08.2017 SHOWN AS ANNX-E AND REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED TO THE R-4 DTD 08.08.2017 SHOWN AS ANNX-F IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANNX-G BY IMPOSING A TIME LIMIT.

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

None appears for the petitioners. The petitioners, who

¶25

have submitted their representations as per Annexures - A to F, have filed this petition for a direction to the authorities -

¶26

¶27

the respondents to act upon their representations. It is seen from the representations that the petitioners want initiation of the proceedings against certain Sri. Mariyanna S/o. Sri. Chati Pathaiah, but Sri. Mariyanna is not arrayed as the respondent. The petition is dismissed on this short ground with liberty to avail further remedy in law.

¶28

SD/JUDGE

¶29

Rajanna H D v. the State of Karnataka Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajanna H D v. the State of Karnataka Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K C Rohith Vs the Prl. Secretary

K C Udaya Vs the Prl. Secretary

Smt. P. Bramaramba Vs Dr. Tulip Chamany

Smt Shanthamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Shanthamma S Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Angasagiriyappa Vs the Thashildar