The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, on preliminary hearing of Writ Petition No. 11776/2021, permitted the petitioner to withdraw the petition after noting an error in the forum of filing the representation.
The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF JULY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11776/2021 (KLR/RES)
BETWEEN :
SRI ANGASAGIRIYAPPA S/O. LATE MUNIYAPPA, R/AT GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 137.
... PETITIONER
(By Sri. NITIN A. M., ADVOCATE)
AND :
THE TAHSHILDAR THE OFFICE OF THE THASHILDAR, MALUR , KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 130.
... RESPONDENT
(By SRI.R. SRINIVASA GOWDA., AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION/REPRESENATIONS FILED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-C DTD 10.06.2021.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
O R D E R
The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition stating that the petitioner had to file representation with the Tahsildhar but the representation is filed with the Assistant Commissioner.
On perusal of the representation dated 10.06.2021
the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition.
SD/JUDGE
nv
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SRI ANGASAGIRIYAPPA S/O. LATE MUNIYAPPA
THE TAHSHILDAR THE OFFICE OF THE THASHILDAR, MALUR
B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
