The writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of an impugned order was dismissed as the counsel for the petitioners did not press the petition and sought leave to withdraw. It was noted that the withdrawal memo was placed on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.5113 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
ALL R/A NO. 94, 11TH CROSS 1ST STAGE, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE -560 038 …PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI. VARDHAMAN V.GUNJAL, ADVOCATE)
AND :
2
MARATHALLI
3
R/A VENKATA SAI SADAN THIPPASANDRA HAL 3RD STAGE
BANGALORE-560 008 ...RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUNGED ORDER DATED 29.06.2019 IN O.S.NO.25458/2014 PASSED BY THE XXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-29) VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri Vardhaman V.Gunjal, learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not press this petition and seeks leave to withdraw the same. His submission is placed on record. He submits that he has already sent a memo to this effect through E-mail.
2. Memo be kept in record. This petition is dismissed as not pressed.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
AV
SRI K GOPAL POOJARI
SRI K MADHAV
SRI K KRISHNA
SRI GAJANAN S D
SMT.S.D.SHANTHA BAI
SRI S.D.ANIL
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court