High Court Court at Bengaluru dismissed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India dated July 22, 2021, for default as the petitioner did not appear for the hearing despite prior notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 49887/2019 (KLR/RES)
BETWEEN :
SRI. VENKATSWAMY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O NARAYANA GOWDA BESTENAHALLI VILLAGE, KAMADENAHALLI POST KOLAR TALUK & DISTRICT - 563 144.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAGADEESHA K J., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND :
2
KOLAR TALUK & DISTRICT -563 144.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.A.R. SRINIVASA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CHANGE THE KATHA IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY.NO.3 OF MATTIKUNTE VILLAGE, HOLUR HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK VIDE ANNEXURE-J WITHIN A PERIOD OF NOT MORE THEN THREE MONTHS.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
None appeared for the petitioner on 22.06.2021
and none appears for the petitioner even today.
Therefore, the petition is dismissed for default.
SD/JUDGE
BSR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. VENKATSWAMY
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE THASILDAR KOLAR
B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
