In a writ petition challenging a tender notification, the Court accepted the submission that the tender period had expired. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as having become infructuous with no further orders passed on merits.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO.48289 OF 2017 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN :
2
(BY MS.SUNANDA SARKAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.RAHUL S.REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND :
(BY SRI.P.B.ACHAPPA, AGA FOR R1 & R2)
3
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE TENDER NOTIFICATION DTD:07.10.2017 ISSUED BY THE COMMISSIONER, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT THAT IS R2 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Ms.Sunanda Sarkar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the time period of the tender notification which is challenged before this Court has already come to an end and the petition would not survive for consideration. Hence, she seeks to dismiss the petition as having become infructuous.
4
The writ petition is dismissed as having
become infructuous .
Sd/JUDGE
RKA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the tender notification survives for consideration given the expiry of the tender period.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Modinsab Mohamedgons Ghodageri
Srihashail Nagappa Aladkatti
Tavaneppa Satappa Badmikai
Suresh Shankar Mugali
Suresh Adiveppa Pattanshetty
Prasanarnjit Shridhar Khatagalli
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
