The State of Karnataka v. Smt. Premalatha
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because the plaint in the underlying suit was already rejected on 13.08.2018, according to the case status report.
The court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because the plaint in the underlying suit was already rejected on 13.08.2018, according to the case status report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.35342/2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
WRIT PETITION No.35342 OF 2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
(BY SMT.SAVITHA.T.H.,HCGP)
AND :
SMT.PREMALATHA W/O N.PUSHPARAJ AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC.HOUSE HOLD WORK R/AT BIRADURU, ARALAGODU VILLAGE KARGAL POST, SAGARA TALUK-577421 … RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 and 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER ON IA NO.3 DATED 10.10.2017 IN OS NO.118/2016
W.P.No.35342/2018
2
PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAGAR AT ANNEXURE-A.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
This petition arises out of interim order passed in OS No.118/2016.
The case status report submitted by the Registry shows that in the said suit plaint is rejected on 13.08.2018. Therefore this petition has become infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
AKC
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Karnataka By Its Chief Secretary To Government Vidhana Soudha Bangaluru
The Tahsildar Sagara Taluk Sagara
The Revenue Inspector Kasaba Hobli Sagar Taluk Office Sagar
Smt. Premalatha
K.S.Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court