High Court of Karnataka found a writ petition under Article 226 infructuous as the underlying appeal had been dismissed in the lower court and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.45818/2018
1
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
WRIT PETITION No.45818/2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
W.P.No.45818/2018
2
R/AT MAJARA HOSAHALLI KASABA HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK – 861 203 …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI VIGNESHWARA U, ADVOCATE)
AND :
SMT.PARVATHAMMA W/O BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT MAJARA HOSAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK-561 203 …RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 01.09.2018 (ANNEXURE-A) PASSED BY THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DODDABALLAPURA IN R.A.NO.10107/2016 ON I.A.NOS.II AND III.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
This petition arises out of interim order dated 01.09.2018 passed in R.A.No.10107/2016. The case status report submitted by the Registry shows that the appeal itself is dismissed on 07.03.2019. Therefore this petition
has become infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KSR
Smt. Parvathamma w/o Basavaraju
K.S. Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
