This court disposed of the writ petition filed under Article 227 to quash an order of the First Addl. Senior Civil Judge. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to comply with office objections despite multiple adjournments.
The writ petition was disposed of for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.32577 OF 2015 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1 . SRI. KRISHNAPPA .V, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O VAJARAPPA,
2 . SRI. A. SEENAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O ARASAPPA,
3 . SRI. SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O ARASAPPA,
4 . SRI. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O ARASAPPA,
5 . T. NARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE THIMMAIAH,
6 . SRI. CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O ARASAPPA,
7 . SRI. PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O LATE EARAMUNIYAPPA, PETITIONERS 1 TO 7 ARE R/AT O.B. CHOWDAHALLI VILLAGE, UDAIPUR POST, UTTAHARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 82
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. D.K.SRIRAMAPPA, ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
1 . B. KRISHNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, W/O A. NARAYAN, R/AT NO. 94/0, 8TH CROSS, RMV II STAGE, SADASHIVANAGARA BANGALORE – 560 080.
2 . SMT. SUMITHRA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O DASEGOWDA, R/AT NO. 3788, 18TH CROSS B.S.K. 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-70.
3 . K.R. JAGADAMBA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS D/O K P RAMAIAH R/AT NO. 394, IYENGAR ROAD, V.V. PURAM, BANGALORE – 560 004.
4 . H.M. SAVITHRAMMA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT NO. 110, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-3.
5 . H. SRIDHAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O H.T. HONNURAPPA, R/AT NO. 199, 33RD CROSS, 7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARA, BANGALORE-11.
6 . DR. H. GEETHA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, D/O H.T. HONNURAPPA, R/AT NO. 4/1, JAIN TEMPLE ROAD, V V PURAM, BANGALORE – 560 004.
7 . DR. H. CHITRA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, D/O H.T. HONNURAPPA, R/AT 5/1, JAIN TEMPLE ROAD, V V PURAM, BANGALORE – 560 004.
3
8 . DR. H. BHARATHI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, D/O H T HONNURAPPA, R/AT 5/1, JAIN TEMPLE ROAD, V.V. PURAM, BANGALORE - 560 004.
9 . H.T. HONNURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT NO. 5, JAIN TEMPLE ROAD, V.V. PURAM, BANGALORE - 560 004.
10 . SMT. NARAYANAMMA, ABOUT 75 YEARS, W/O H.T. HONNURAPPA, R/AT NO. 5, JAIN TEMPLE ROAD, V.V. PURAM, BANGALORE – 560 004.
11 . K.L. SRIHARI, AGE ABOUT 77 YEARS, S/O LATE KHODY LAKSHMAN SA,
12 . K.H. GURUNATH, AGE ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O K.L. SRIHARI,
13 . K.H. SRINIVAS, AGE ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O K.L. SRIHARI,
14 . K.L. ANANTHA PADMANABHA SA, AGE ABOUT 75 YEARS, S/O LATE LAKSHMANA SA
15 . K.P. GANESHAM, AGE ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O K.L. ANANTHA PADMANABHA SA,
16 . K.L. NARAYANA SA, AGE ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O LATE KHODY LAKSHMAN SA,
17 . K.N. ESWARA SA, AGE ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O K.L. NARAYANA SA,
4
18 . K.M. MADHUSUDHAN, AGE ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O K.L. NARAYANA SA,
RESPONDENT NO.11 TO 18 ARE ALL R/AT NO.9, SHESHADRI ROAD, GANDHINAGARA, BANGALORE – 560 009.
19 . L. GOPAL KRISHNA, AGE ABOUT 53 YEARS, ALIAS GOPAL GOWDA, S/O LATE LENKHAPPA, R/AT ODERAHALLI VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, THATHAGUNI POST, BANGALORE-82.
20 . B.P. SANATHANA MURTHY, AGE ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O B.P. SREEKANTAIAH, R/AT NO. 632, 6TH ‘B’ MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGARA, BANGALORE – 560 011.
21 . K.P. KASHINATH, AGE ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.9, SESHADARI ROAD, GANDHINAGARA AND BANGALORE – 560 009. 22 . MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 23 . NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 24 . NAGARAJA, AGE ABOUT 41 YEARS S/O EARACHANAPPA, RESPONDENT NOS.22 TO 24 ARE R/AT O.B. CHOWDAHALLI VILLAGE, UDAIPUR POST, UTTHARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE-82.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER
5
PASSED BY TEH FIRST ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, ORDER PASSED ON I.A. NO.8, 9 AND 10 IN O.S. NO. 667/2005 DATED 20.4.2015 VIDE ANN-F BY ALLOWING THE PETITION AND I.A.NO.8, 9 AND 10.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Writ petition is disposed off for non-prosecution since petitioners have failed to comply with the office-objections
despite availing several adjournments.
Sd/JUDGE
DS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Article 227 to quash the order of the civil court should be allowed given the non-prosecution and failure to comply with office objections.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Krishnappa .V
Sri. A. Seeappa
Sri. Srinivasa
Sri. Nagaraju
T. Narasappa
Sri. Channappa
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
