Muniraju v. Papamma
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court adjourned the writ petition for one week to enable the petitioners to take steps, failing which it would be dismissed.
What did the court decide?
One week time granted for taking steps, failing which the writ petition stands dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.23593/2015 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN
1 . MUNIRAJU SON OF LATE NARAYANAMMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
2 . PARASURAM SON OF LATE NARAYANAMMA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
3 . SUBBU @ SUBRAMANI SON OF LATE NARAYANAMMA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BENGALURU 560066.
…PETITIONER/S
(BY SRI./SMT.: ABHINAY Y T , ADVOCATE)
W.P.NO.23593/2015
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Muniraju Son of Late Narayanamma
- petitioner
Parasuram Son of Late Narayanamma
- respondent
Papamma
- respondent
Tulasiemma
- respondent
M/s. Neo Developers
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/23593/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court