Writ petition to quash a trial court order posting an execution case for evidence, alleging obstruction. The High Court found the petition infructuous as main proceedings were disposed of and dismissed it.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.25259/2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
WRIT PETITION No.25259/2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
Sri. Shivaram Babu Devadiga S/o Babu Devadiga Aged About 46 Years R/a. Sri Venkateshwara Condiments Kote Gavdi Building, Court Road Doddaballapura-561 203 Bangalore Rural District.
… PETITIONER
(By Sri. Sadanand Shastri, Advocate)
AND :
W.P.No.25259/2018
2
Ganesha Block Dinnur Main Road R.T. Nagar Bangalore-560 032.
(R1 - SERVED)
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Order dated 07.06.2018, passed by the learned trial Judge in Execution Case No.736/2018 on the file of the Court of the XII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, [CCH-27] at Bangalore, in so far it relates to directly posting the execution case for Evidence of this Petitioner/Obstructer within 1 week though petitioner is bed-ridden, at 'Annexure-A' by a Writ of Certiorari or any other Writ, Order or Direction and etc.
This Writ Petition coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main proceedings before the trial Court have been disposed of and
this petition has become infructuous. Therefore, petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
LRS
Sd/JUDGE
Shivaram Babu Devadiga
Mrs. Malini V. Rao
Mr. U. Vijaya Kumar
Mrs. Getha Rao
K.S.Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court