The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an interim execution order as infructuous, noting that the underlying execution petition was already disposed of by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No.36463/2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. MUDAGAL
WRIT PETITION NO. 36463 OF 2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI.K.SADANANDA SHETTY, S/O. LATE MAHABALA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT MAHABALA NIVAS, KORANGARAPADY, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRCT-576 101.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASANNA V.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. RAMESH KANCHAN, S/O. BOGRA SALIAN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT FLAT 309, RADHANANDA RESIDENCY, INDRALI TEMPLE ROAD, INDRALI, UDUPI, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT-576 101.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. B.J. MAHESH, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 23.07.2018 IN EX.P.NO.22/2014 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM, UDUPI VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
ORDER
This petition arises out of the interim order passed by the trial Court in Execution Petition No.22/2014. The case status report submitted by the Registry shows that Execution Petition No.22/2014 itself is disposed of on 09.11.2020. Therefore, this petition has become infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Rsk/-
SRI.K.SADANANDA SHETTY
SRI. RAMESH KANCHAN
K.S. Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
