Smt Vijayalakshmi v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging amendments to bye-laws by a third respondent administrator. The Court directed the second respondent (Registrar) to dispose of an interim application in the pending appeal as soon as possible and maintain status quo until such disposal.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Registrar to pass orders on the interim application on the next date and consider expeditious disposal of the appeal on merits. Order to maintain status quo pending such orders.