Allowed

Wellnest India Projects Private Limited v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Karnataka HC23 Dec 2021WP/22494/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed ex-parte income tax notices and an assessment order for the 2018-19 year. The court held that sending notices to an inoperative email address prevented the petitioner from complying, violating natural justice. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration with a personal hearing.

What did the court decide?

The assessment order, demand notices, and penalty notices dated April 2021 are quashed. The matter is remitted for reconsideration after affording a personal hearing.

Wellnest India Projects Private Limited Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION No.22494 OF 2021 (T-IT)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

WELLNEST INDIA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED PROPERTY NO 4/1, HOTEL TRIBUVAN 4^TH FLOOR, 5^TH MAIN GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE -560 009 REP. HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR MR SIDDAIAH PURUSHOTHAM

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI T.SURYANARAYANA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR

¶11

SMT.TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATES)

¶12

AND:

¶13

ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INCOME TAX OFFICER NATIONAL E- ASESSEMNT CENTRE ROOM NO.401, 2^ND FLOOR E-RAMP JAWARLAL NEHRU STAUDIUM DELHI -110 003

¶14

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 7(1)(3), BANGALORE BMTC BUIDLING , 6^TH BLOCK 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE 560 095

¶15

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX -2 BMTC BUILDING, 6^TH BLOCK 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE 560 095

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)

¶18

²

¶19

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 19.04.2021 PASSED BY THE R1 U/S 144 OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

¶21

ORDER

¶22

In this petition, petitioner seeks quashing of the

¶23

impugned assessment order at Annexure-D dated 19.04.2021 and for other reliefs.

¶24

Heard Sri.T.Suryanarayana, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

¶25

In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the petition and referring to the documents produced by the petitioner, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that all correspondence including notices etc., issued to the petitioner by the respondents were being sent to the email furnished by the petitioner. However, the said email and contact became inoperative resulting in the petitioner not being aware of any communication / email

¶26

³

¶27

sent to the said email addresses including any notices sent by the respondents. Under these circumstances, the notices dated 13.04.2021, 15.04.2021 and 19.04.2021 issued by the respondents in the name of the petitioner and sent to the defunct / inoperative email address did not come to the knowledge or attention of the petitioner who was neither aware of the same nor had the occasion or opportunity to reply to the said notices issued by the respondents. Under these circumstances, the petitioner could not reply nor furnish the details to the respondents as called for in their notices and consequently, in view of the inability and omission on the part of the petitioner to submit objections and furnish details and documents due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause, since the petitioner had no knowledge or information about the notices sent to the defunct / inoperative email address, the respondents have proceeded to pass the impugned ex-parte assessment order, which is violative of principles of natural justice.

¶28

(i) It is further submitted that the petitioner had no knowledge even about the impugned assessment order

¶29

⁴

¶30

dated 19.04.2021 and the petitioner came to know about the proceedings and the impugned order only subsequently in November 2021, when he received a phone call from an official of the respondents, pursuant to which, the petitioner has filed the present petition.

¶31

(ii) It is therefore contended that the impugned assessment order passed by the respondents without giving sufficient or reasonable opportunity to the petitioner is violative of principles of natural justice and the same deserves to be quashed and the matter may be remitted back to the respondents for reconsideration afresh after giving an opportunity to the petitioner and considering his objections, documents and hearing him in accordance with law.

¶32

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

¶33

As rightly contended by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, the material on record indicates that on account of the defunct / inoperative email address,

¶34

⁵

¶35

the petitioner did not have any knowledge of any correspondence addressed by the respondents to the said email address which had become defunct and inoperative resulting in the petitioner not being in a position to suitably reply to any of the notices issued by the respondents and file his objections, documents, details, particulars etc., as sought for by the respondents. It is clear that on account of the inability and omission on the part of the petitioner to file his objections and produce documents etc., due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause, the respondents have proceeded to pass the ex-parte impugned order, which deserves to be set aside and the matter be remitted back to the respondents for reconsideration afresh after giving one more opportunity to the petitioner.

¶36

In the result, I pass the following:-

¶37

ORDER

¶38

(i) Petition is hereby allowed.

¶39

(ii) The impugned assessment order dated

¶40

19.04.2021 at Annexures-D; the impugned Demand notice

¶41

⁶

¶42

dated 19.04.2021 at Annexure-E; the impugned notice for penalty dated 19.04.2021 at Annexure-F; the impugned notice for penalty dated 15.04.2021 at Annexure-G and the impugned notice for penalty dated 19.04.2021 at AnnexureH, all issued by the 1^st respondent are hereby quashed.

¶43

(iii) The matter is remitted back to respondent No.1 – Assessment Officer for re-consideration afresh and by affording an opportunity to the petitioner to file objections and documents by giving him personal hearing in the matter in accordance with law.

¶44

SD/- JUDGE

¶45

Srl.

Wellnest India Projects Private Limited v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Wellnest India Projects Private Limited v. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alten Calsoft Labs (India) Pvt.Ltd Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Sri Nagendra K Vs the Managing Director

Sri D Ramu Vs the Chief General Manager

Hanuman Motors Private Limited Vs Union of India

M/S Kirloskar Brothers Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Mohammed Nasser Vs Joint Commissioner of Customs