Writ petition filed seeking direction to respondents to consider a representation. Court recorded petitions counsel's submission that the petition is withdrawn and dismissed accordingly, allowing petitioner to seek appropriate remedy elsewhere.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Petitioner at liberty to seek appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP.NO.21700/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
WRIT PETITION NO.21700 OF 2018(GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SURENDRA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS SON OF RAMESH SHETTY RESIDING AT SAHANA ESTATE ANKADAKATTE, KOTESHWARA VILLAGE KUNDAPURA TALUK- 576 222. ... PETITIONER
(By Sri. P.P. HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
UDUPI DISTRICT – 576 201.
2
(By SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT R1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED: 17.04.2018 VIDE ANNEX-G AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘ B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the first respondent has filed the chargesheet in the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
bnv*
SRI. SURENDRA SHETTY
STATE OF KARNATAKA
K.S.MUDAGAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
