Petitioner, absent after four hearings and deemed uninterested, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash proceedings. The High Court dismissed the petition in absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.65613/2016
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
WRIT PETITION No.65613/2016 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN :
Sri.V.Muniyappa S/o Sri.Venkatappa Aged about 62 years Residing at No.438, 6th “B” Main, II Block, Kalyananagar Bengaluru – 560 043 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI.V.B.Shivakumar, ADV.(absent))
AND :
W.P.No.65613/2016
2
Bengaluru City Division M.S. Buildings Bengaluru – 560 001
Sri.K.S.Abhijith, HCGP for R2, ADV.)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE –A AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER ISSUED WITHOUT AN ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE, UNDER SECTION 93 AND WITHOUT ANY JUDICIAL ORDER, SEARCH WARRANT TOTALLY INSTITUTED IS ILLEGAL AND UNLAWFUL IN THE EYE OF LAW.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
None appears for the petitioner. The records
show that on the previous four hearing dates, there is no representation for the petitioner.
Petitioner seems to be not interested in
prosecuting the matter. Therefore, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
akc
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri. V. Muniyappa
State of Karnataka
K.S. Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court