Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash a notice and direct respondents to issue a fresh notification. On preliminary hearing, the petitioner requested leave to withdraw the petition, which was granted, and the petition was dismissed.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.1643 OF 2018 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN :
S. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE SRIKANTA SWAMY OCCUPATION-MOBILE CANTEEN R/AT BEHIND TIPPAPURA CHOULTRY MADHUGIRI-TOWN TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 132 …PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. P. RUDRAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND :
(BY SHRI. B.V. KRISHNA, AGA)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DTD27.12.2017 ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNEXURE-A, BY DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE THE FRESH NOTIFICATION/PUBLICATION WITH LUCID DESCRIPTION AND FACTS.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri Rudrappa, learned advocate for petitioner has
filed a memo of even date seeking leave to withdraw
this petition.
Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Yn.
S. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE SRIKANTA SWAMY
STATE OF KARNATAKA
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER SRI DANDINA MARAMMA TEMPLE
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
