Petitioner withdrew the writ petition filed against the respondents regarding the recovery of a gold loan. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.4988/2021 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
MR.DEVARAJ REDDY.M S/O LATE N.G.MALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/A NO.1265, SRI GOWRI NILAYA 22ND MAIN, 11TH CROSS, 1ST SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT BENGALURU URBAN KARNATAKA
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.RANGA RAMU.V, ADVOCATE THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)
AND:
2
HOSUR MAIN ROAD, MADIWALA BENGALURU-560068
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R4 TO ACT ON THE COMPLAINT DATED 19.01.2021 AT ANNEXURE-A AND THEREBY TO RESTRAINING THE R-1 TO 3/RESPONDENTS BANK, FROM THEIR ILLEGAL ACT, DEEDS AND THINGS IN WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN HARASSING AND GIVEN MENTAL AND PHYSICAL TORTURE TO THE INNOCENT PETITIONER HEREIN FOR RECOVERY OF GOLD LOAN WITHOUT FOLLOWING DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMNARY HAERING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri.Ranga Ramu.V., learned Advocate for the petitioner
seeks leave to withdraw this petition. He undertakes to file a
memo to this effect. Leave granted. Once received, Memo
shall be kept in record. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
VM
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Devaraj Reddy M
Muthoot Finance Limited (Respondents 1-3)
The Banking Ombudsman
P.S. Dinesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
