Dismissed

Sri Chandrappa v. Authorised Officer

Karnataka HC26 Jul 2021WP/13208/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner sought liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal, and the court directed respondents to take no precipitative action for ten days.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Debts Recovery Tribunal; no precipitative action for ten days.

Sri Chandrappa Vs Authorised Officer — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 26^TH DAY OF JULY, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION No.13208 OF 2021 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN :

¶8

SRI. CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A MAGONDHI HIREKARAPANAHALLI BANGARPET KOLAR DISTRICT-563 114 …PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SHRI. V. MOHAN, ADVOCATE)

¶10

[THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE]

¶11

AND:

¶12

AUTHORISED OFFICER STATE BANK OF INDIA BANGARAPETE BRANCH KOLAR MAIN ROAD BANGARAPETE KOLAR DISTRICT-563 114

¶13

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT KOLAR-563 101

¶14

THE TASHILDAR BANGARPET TLAUK BANGARPETE-563 114

¶15

¶16

SRI. T.R. SUPREETH S/O SRI. T.S. RAVI KUMAR AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS PARTNER M/S VINAYAKA AGRO INDUSTRIES SY NO. 49/1,49/2/51/1 AND 52/2 GORAVANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI BANGARPET-TEKAL ROAD BANGARPET (TALUK) PIN-563 114 (KOLAR DIST.)

¶17

SMT. T.R. KALPANA W/O T.S. RAVI KUMAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS PARTNER M/S VINAYAKA AGRO INDUSTRIES SY NO. 49/1,49/2/51/1 AND 52/2 GORAVANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI BANGARPET-TEKAL ROAD BANGARPET (TALUK) PIN-563 114 (KOLAR DIST.) ... RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R2 & R3)

¶19

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD.17.3.2021 ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE R-3 IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY.

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

¶22

ORDER

¶23

After arguing the matter for some time, Shri Mohan, learned advocate for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal. He has filed a memo of even date to the said effect.

¶24

Memo be kept in the record. This petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶25

No precipitative action shall be taken by the

¶26

respondents for a period of ten days.

¶27

In view of disposal of this petition, pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and it stands disposed of.

No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Yn.

Sri Chandrappa v. Authorised Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Chandrappa v. Authorised Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. S.G. Ramesh Kumar Vs Sri. Annappa

M/S Bhaskar Hotel and Restaurant Vs the Chief Executive Officer

Sri C.Bheemaraj Vs Smt. Rathnamma

A Sadashiva Reddy Vs Assistant Commissioner

A N Ashok Vs Union of India

B. S. Rajanikanth Vs State of Karnataka