Writ petition regarding quarry lease rights declared infructuous; petition dismissed. Interlocutory applications disposed. Bench noted by Acting Chief Justice and Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.12108 OF 2020 (GM-MM-S)
BETWEEN:
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.GANAPATI BHAT VAJRALLI, ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.S.S.MAHENDRA, AGA)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE PETITIONER IS ENTITLED FOR 30 YEARS OF LEASE OR LICENSE WHICH IS DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN GRANTED FROM THE DATE OF ORIGINAL GRANT IN RESPECT OF QUARRY LEASE NO.508 IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS PER THE (8)(A)(2) PROVISO (2) OF KMMC RULES, 1994 AMENDED 2016 AND ETC.,
3
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel has fairly stated before this Court that
the present writ petition has become infructuous.
The same stands disposed of accordingly.
The pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
Sd/ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/JUDGE
CA
Smt. M Shashikala and Vijay Units
State of Karnataka and others
Satish Chandra Sharma
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
