High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging an NCLT order in a corporate insolvency matter, as the petitioner withdrew the petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.11108/2020 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS DREAMS INFRA INDIA LTD., REPRESENTED BY KIRAN MISHRA R/AT FLAT 305, MSR MANSION 3/2, SRIPURA VILLAGE, NEAR MUNESHWARATEMPLE JAKKUR POST, BENGALURU – 560 064.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.A.MAHESH CHOWDHARY FOR SRI.NAGARAJA NAIDU.A, ADVs.)
AND:
2
SHANKARAPURAM
BENGALURU – 560 004
3
DOMMASANDRA POST SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU – 562 125
4
NEAR TATA NAGAR BENGALURU – 560 054.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.C.LOKESHA, ADV. FOR R1 SRI.P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV. FOR R2 SMT.RAKSHA KEERTHANA.K., FOR SRI.KEMPARAJU, ADVs. FOR R4 SRI.V.B.SHIVAKUMAR, ADV. FOR R5 SRI.G.V.SUDHAKAR FOR SRI.B.PRAMOD, ADV. FOR R6 SRI.MALLIKARJUN.N.K, ADV. FOR R9 R3, R8, R11, R13, R15 SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED COMMON ORDER PASSED BY HON’BLE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL DATED 4TH SEPTEMBER 2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE HON’BLE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN IA NO.205 TO 218 AND 304 TO 311/2020 ARISING OUT OF COP (IB) NO.84/BB/2019 AS UNJUST, ILLEGAL, VIOLATIVE OF PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND ARBITRARY IN NATURE AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE PRAYER SOUGHT FOR IN THE APPLICATION VIDE ANNEXURE-F TO W.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.A.Mahesh Chowdhary, learned Advocate for the
petitioner submits that he has filed a memo in the office seeking withdrawal of the petition.
5
3. Placing the submission of learned Advocate for the
petitioner on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
VM
2 provisions across 1 enactments
COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS DREAMS INFRA INDIA LTD.
SRI.V.SURESH KUMAR
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
SRI.SAJJANRAJ
MR.B.M.BALRAM
M/S. APARTMENT BUYERS CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
