Ravisha v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking mandamus to redo durasti land survey. The Court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the Assistant Director of Land Records with copies of relevant orders, directing the latter to complete the work upon receipt. The petitioner was not granted the specific direction sought. Out of scope: judge name
What did the court decide?
Petitioner permitted to file representation with Assistant Director of Land Records to take expedited measures for completing durasti work.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10893/2017 (KLR RR/SUR)
BETWEEN :
RAVISHA S/O MALLESHAPPA AGED 35 YEARS R/O BENDEKERE VILLAGE BANAVARA HOBLI ARASIKERE TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. JAGADEESH H. T., ADVOCATE)
AND :
- THE SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU - 01.
- THE TAHASILDAR ARASIKERE HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Writ Court should issue a mandamus directing the Tahasildar to redo the durasti work of land.
Whether the jurisdictional Assistant Director of Land Records should be approached instead of the Tahasildar for the remedy.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ravisha
- respondent
The Secretary State of Karnataka Department of Revenue
- respondent
The Tahasildar Arasikere Hassan District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/10893/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court