Petitioners sought withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to pursue alternative remedy under Section 50 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, pending condonation of delay.
Writ petition disposed with liberty to avail alternative remedy; consideration of condonation of delay stayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF JUNE 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 43768/2015 (LR/RES)
BETWEEN :
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT SONDEKOPPA, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 130.
... PETITIONERS
(By Sri. C M NAGABUSHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND :
2
BANGALORE - 560 009.
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT SONDEKOPPA, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 130.
... RESPONDENTS
(By SRI.A.R. SRINIVAS, AGA FOR R1 TO R2; SRI. NARAYAN M. NAIK & SRI. VIDHUSHI M.V., ADVOCATES FOR R3 & R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 16-06/2006 IN LRF 7(A) 18/1999-2000 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AS PER ANNEXURE-D.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy under Section 50 of the Karnataka Land
3
Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'the Land Revenue Act'). The learned counsel for the respondents No.3 and 4 submits that the petitioners have filed this petition impugning the order passed in the year 2006, and even as of the date of the filing of the petition, the petitioners had lost the right to challenge because of limitation.
SD/JUDGE
nv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners are eligible to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy or if the petition is time-barred.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
NANJAPPA S/O LATE SIDDAPPA
PRAKESH S/O LATE SIDDAPPA
STATE OF KARNATAKA
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O LATE NARAYANA RAO
GOPAL SWAMY S/O LATE NARAYANA RAO
B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
