Petitioners sought restoration of Tagore Park via writ petition. Respondents submitted that construction was demolished and restoration steps are underway. The court found no need for further directions and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G.UMA
W.P.No.10712/2020 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
… Petitioners
(By Sri. G.R.Mohan, Advocate (VC))
AND:
2
NR Square, Hudson Circle, Bengaluru – 560 001.
… Respondents
(By Sri.V.Sreenidhi, Advocate for R-1 to R-3)
This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue writ of mandamus to respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners dated:11.09.2020 as per Annexure-E and to restore the part area called Tagore Park in BBMP ward No.33 between 3rd and 1st cross, RT Nagara 2nd Block, Bengaluru – 560 032.
This petition coming on for Orders this day, NAGARATHNA, J., made the following:
3
ORDER
4
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
PKS
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant further directions on the restoration of Tagore Park after demolition of construction.
Whether to maintain the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
Whether to consider the representation dated 11.09.2020 regarding the restoration of the public park.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. S.R. Varambally
Sri. C. Prabhu
The Commissioner Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagar Palike
The Chief Engineer Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagar Palike
The Assistant Engineer, Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagar Palike
The Executive Engineer, Bengaluru Development Authority
B.V. Nagarathna
M.G. Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
