Writ appeal filed under Section 4, Karnataka High Court Act to set aside a single judge's order allowing a writ petition. Court found appeal infructuous after memo filed and dismissed it.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G. UMA
WRIT APPEAL No.4077/2019 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI B.R. SIDDARAMU S/O. SRI R. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, BETTAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL – 562 123 UPADHYAKSHA GOLLAHALLI PANCHAYATH. ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI ROHAN HOSMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
GOLLAHALI VILLAGE, NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL – 562 123.
NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL – 562 123.
(BY SRI LAXMINARAYAN, ADDL. GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2; SRI NISHANTH A.V., ADVOCATE FOR C/R-5)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.40512/2019 (LB-RES) DATED 19/12/2019 AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
stating that the appeal has been rendered infructuous.
Hence, the appeal may be disposed of accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
S*
Sri B.R. Siddaramu
State of Karnataka
Assist. Commissioner DoddABELLAPURA
Gollahalli Grama Panchayath
Mrs. Mahalakshmi
Mrs. Bhagymma
B.V. Nagarathna
M.G. Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
