The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a writ petition filed for quashing a notification on the ground that it had become infructuous. No substantive order was passed.
Petition disposed of as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
W.P. No. 104585/2019 (CS-EL/M)
BETWEEN:
PRASHANT KUMAR S/O RAMAPPA HOSALLI, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC.: SERVICE, R/O ESI HOSPITAL, KARWAD ROAD, ARVIND NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580 024, DIST.: DHARWAD.
(BY SRI SYED R.H. AND M.K. ATTAR, ADVOCATES)
AND:
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED CALENDEROF EVENTS / NOTIFICATION PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 DATED 10.01.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-C & ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petition has become infructuous.
SD
JUDGE
bvv
2 provisions across 1 enactments
PRASHANT KUMAR
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BELAGAVI DIVISION ELECTION OFFICER
ELECTION RETURNING OFFICER
THE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
