without concrete bed, the wall was collapsed. The said complaint was accepted by the Upa-Lokayukta and thereafter the entire case was entrusted to the Assistant Registrar, Enquiries-7 for enquiry. The Enquiry Officer, after issuing Articles of Charge dated 03.11.2015, conducted the enquiry and thereafter, held that the applicant/petitioner was guilty and he was responsible for not properly maintaining the supervision with regard to construction of the compound wall. Pursuant to the enquiry made by the 2nd respondent herein, the 1st respondent has taken a decision of withholding two annual increments with cumulative effect and further ordered for recovery of sum of Rs.23,428/from the petitioner/applicant by order dated 28.02.2018. The said order was challenged by the petitioner/Applicant before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, after considering the materials on record, and after considering the fact that the applicant has not made out a case for interference insofar as enquiry conducted by the 2nd respondent herein holding the applicant guilty, has dismissed the Application. Being aggrieved by the dismissal of the Application by the Tribunal, the petitioner has presented this writ petition before us.
