The contempt petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Karnataka upon the submitter's prayer.
The contempt petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF APRIL, 2021 PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
C.C.C. NO. 100047/2021 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
DR. PREMA KUMARA K, S/O. H. B. KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT: 52 YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT: B-002, “AKSHAYA RESIDENCY”, AKSHAYA COLONY, OPP-CHETANA COLLEGE, VIDYANAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD-580030.
… COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. RAVI. HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND
…ACCUSED/RESPONDENTS
2
THIS CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971, READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TAKE CONGNIZANCE OF AN OFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SEC.11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING WILL-FULLY DISOBEYED THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED ON I.A.NO.2/20, IN WP.NO.116519/2019 (S-RES) DATED 11.09.2020, (ANNEXRE-C) AND ETC.,
THIS CONTEMPT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR. J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri. Ravi Hegde for the complainant submits that the respondents/accused have already released the salary amount and implemented the order. Therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw this contempt petition. His submission is placed on record and he is permitted to withdraw the petition. Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
SD
JUDGE
SD JUDGE
CLK
Dr. Prema Kumara K
Mr. Kumar Naik G.
Prof. K.N. Ganganaik
Sreenivas Harish Kumar
E.S.Indires
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
