Dismissed
V Nandan Kamath v. Muralinath Gupta
Karnataka HCWA/199/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
WRIT APPEAL NO.199 OF 2021 (L-PG)
BETWEEN:
V. NANDAN KAMATH, S/O LATE V. BHASKAR KAMATH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, CRS EMP NO.212511, D. NO.4-2-39C, "SHANTHERI KRIPA" 6TH NAIRKERE CROSS ROAD, UDUPI-576103. ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. AJAY PRABHU M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
(BY SRI. T.P.MUTHANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 09.04.2018 IN W.P. NO.42979/2016 (L-
2
PG) PASSED BY LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE TO THE EXTENT OF DISALLOWING THE VIDE ANNEXURE-A TO THE WRIT PETITION FILED CHALLENGING THE NOTICE DATED 18.01.2014 AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE WP NO.42979/2016 FILED BY THE APPELLANT AS PRAYED FOR.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, NATARAJ RANGASWAMY , J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel Sri Ajay Prabhu submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to file fresh appeal, in case if need arises in future.
liberty to the appellant to file a Writ Appeal / Review, in case if need arises in future.
All contentions are left open.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
hnm
Nandan Kamath
Muralinath Gupta
Chairman Syndicate Bank
Satish Chandra Sharma
Nataraj Rangaswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court