Special Leave Petition filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Valued Added Tax Act, 2003 against a judgment of the Karnataka High Court dismissing a writ petition, which was accepted as withdrawn.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition in the future.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
STRP NO.5/2021
BETWEEN
SIEMENS LTD NO. 49, ST. MARKS ROAD, JYOTHI MAHAL, BENGALURU 560001. REP BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER – INDIRECT TAXATION, MOHAN SINGH, AGED 55 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO. L2-304, ICON HAPPY LIVING, KAMASANDRA ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY PHASE 2, BENGALURU 560 100
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI P.B.HARISH, ADV.)
AND
2
...RESPONDENTS
THIS STRP FILED UNDER SEC. 65(1) OF THE KARNATAKA VALUED ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.10.2020 PASSED IN STA.NO.19/2019 BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU AND SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 30.10.2018 PASSED IN CST AP NO.26/16-17 (AY 2013-14) BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEAL)-I SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL FOR THE TAX PERIODS OF APRIL 2013 TO MARCH 2014.
THIS STRP COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA. J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
A memo filed for withdrawal of the petition is accepted.
to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, in case need so arises in future.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
Cs
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Siemens Ltd
The State of Karnataka
Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals)-1
The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit)
Satish Chandra Sharma
Nataraj Rangaswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
