A writ appeal regarding the withdrawal of a petition challenging the non-consideration of the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Education (Amendment) Act 2014, filed on behalf of numerous teachers. The court found the appeal infructuous due to the filing of a withdrawal memo.
Memo of withdrawal allowed; appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
WRIT APPEAL NO.1716/2019 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
2
RETIRED ASSITANT TEACHER, ST.JOSEPHS GIRLS HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, C.B.BELLARY-583 102.
3
(BY SRI.R.PADMANABHA, ADV.,)
4
AND:
5
HUKKERIMUTT SHIVABASAVESHWARA HIGH SCHOOL HAVERI, HAVERI DISTRICT R/AT ASHWININAGARA, 2ND CROSS HAVERI-581 110.
6
7
8
9
10
11
WORKING AS ASSISTANT TEACHER SMT. BASAMMA HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL KORACHARAGERI C.B. BELLARY-583 102
12
KALAMMA STREET, BELLARY-583 102 R/AT 1ST CROSS, DEVI NAGAR, BELLARY-583 102
13
14
R/AT NO.55, WARD NO.28, 2ND CROSS, GOLD SMIT COLONY, COWL BAZAAR, BELLARY-583 102
15
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.S.S.MAHENDRA, AGA)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE MADE IN WP NO. 4685246924/2015 DATED 28.11.2018 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO NONCONSIDERATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF KARNATAKA EDUCATION (AMENDMENT) ACT 2014, GAZETTED ON 9.1.2014 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-Z 123 IN THE WRIT PETITION AND TO ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION AS PRAYED FOR AND PASS APPROPRIATE SUITABLE ORDER, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J. , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants have filed a memo
for withdrawal of the appeal as it has become infructuous.
The memo is allowed.
The appeal is dismissed as infructuous in terms of the
memo.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/-
nd
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Clera R.X.
State of Karnataka
Satish Chandra Sharma
V. Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
